Don’t Shield Them From Distress
…when change is needed.
I have written here about the Formula For Change, which can be summarized in this way: change is unlikely, and probably impossible, until the product of distress, an appealing vision, and the capacity to change is great enough to overcome whatever resistance exists.
A key word in that summary is “product.” It indicates that if any one of distress, vision or capacity is zero, change will not occur.
No distress, no change. It is sad, but there it is. Lots of people knew that the Gulf Coast was a disaster waiting to happen, but it took Katrina to supply enough distress to initiate change. Lots of people knew that America was vulnerable to terrorist attack, but it took 9/11 to supply enough distress to initiate change. We can argue about the efficacy of the changes being made, but it seems unarguable that change would not have been initiated without distress.
Over the last few years we have also watched films illuminate the need for enough distress to initiate change in the biographies of Ray Charles and Johnny Cash. I feel certain that you too have experienced change-inducing distress, or that you know someone who has.
So, if you manage others and they need to change, don’t shield them from distress. If friends or family members need to change, don’t shield them from distress. This does not mean setting out to cause distress. It usually means telling the truth, no matter how difficult to bear that truth may be.
And don’t expect that telling the truth alone will be enough to initiate change: expect instead that witholding distressing truths may render change impossible.
(see follow-up post containing an example…)
Monday, July 17th, 2006 at 9:55 am ◊ Comment or trackback◊ Send this post to someone who will thank you for it »
◊ Filed in: Organization Change | Talking & Listening | Life's Lessons






August 2nd, 2006 at 12:39 am
Excellent insights here! I’ve just referenced this post on my blog The Adventure of Strategy (www.robmillard.com) - just in case the trackback doesn’t register. Regards, Rob Millard.
December 27th, 2006 at 1:13 pm
It’s true then that to go along with the flow is to really not move at all. No distress no change… interesting way of putting it. One can argue that there are those that refuse to change even in times of distress and by some chance the distress discipates on its own, allowing them to not change as well. So therefore is it really the distress that creates the change or something else?
Thanks for the insight though..
Jim
Don Lapre James
webmaster@gidnoc.com
www.gidnoc.com
December 27th, 2006 at 5:30 pm
Don - Thanks for stopping in! I too know many people for whom great distress did not produce change. The Formula For Change does not imply that distress causes change, but that people do not change without some measure of distress. Even slight distress can be enough if the other factors–vison and ability–are great enough.
January 9th, 2007 at 12:01 pm
I did assume that you meant the distress caused the change and for that I appreciate the clarification. It’s a great example and look forward to reading more on the subject.
Best wishes.
Jim
Don Lapre James
webmaster@gidnoc.com
www.gidnoc.com